AGENTKIT/WORKS

ClawMetry — AI search visibility

Zero-config observability and governance dashboard for AI coding-agent runtimes -- live token costs, tool calls, sessions and audit logs across 26 supported agents (Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, OpenClaw and others) · clawmetry.com

Cited in 0 of 10 buyer queries

Rank 50 of 101 on the index · checked 2026-09-08 · every row below is a measured result, not an estimate

THE QUERIES, AND WHO GETS NAMED INSTEAD

Buyer queryClawMetryNamed instead
how do I track how much my team spends on Claude Code and CursorNot cited—
observability for AI coding agentsNot cited—
audit log of what an AI coding agent did in our repoNot citedgithub.com/scadastrangelove/agent-audit
AI coding agent governance and policy controls for engineering teamsNot cited—
alternatives to Langfuse for AI agent observabilityNot cited—
OpenClaw usage monitoring dashboardNot citedfour free GitHub projects
Helicone vs Langfuse vs BraintrustNot cited—
dashboard to see all my Claude Code sessions and tool callsNot citedFive free projects
how do I know which AI coding agents my developers are runningNot cited—
single tool to monitor Cursor, Copilot and Claude Code in one dashboardNot citedThree free GitHub projects

Method: queries are phrased the way a buyer would ask, run against live AI answer engines on the date shown. “Cited” means the answer named ClawMetry or drew on its site as a source. The full audit behind this page also records every source domain per query.

Why ClawMetry doesn't appear — and how to fix it

The full audit names the exact pages answer engines read in this category, the three cheapest gaps to close, and the pages to publish first. It exists already — it is how this score was measured.

Something wrong or already fixed? Re-audits are free and this page updates either way.

NEARBY ON THE INDEX